[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Document the current module system?
From: |
Martin Grabmueller |
Subject: |
Re: Document the current module system? |
Date: |
Mon, 23 Apr 2001 17:15:38 +0200 (MET DST) |
> From: NIIBE Yutaka <address@hidden>
> Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2001 14:58:59 +0900 (JST)
>
> Well, here's the evidence where "recursive namespace" still lives.
>
> Directory structure
> --- m.scm (module which exports symbol "x")
> m ---- x.scm (the module named "x" under module "m")
>
[ snip ]
> Here, the symbol "x" in module "m" pollutes the module (m x).
Urgs. I think I would vote that this `feature' does not go into the
next-module-system-wishlist.
Regards,
'martin
- Re: Document the current module system?, (continued)
Document the current module system?, NIIBE Yutaka, 2001/04/19
- Re: Document the current module system?, Martin Grabmueller, 2001/04/19
- Re: Document the current module system?, Rob Browning, 2001/04/20
- Re: Document the current module system?, NIIBE Yutaka, 2001/04/23
- Re: Document the current module system?, NIIBE Yutaka, 2001/04/23
- Re: Document the current module system?,
Martin Grabmueller <=
- Recursive namespace, Keisuke Nishida, 2001/04/23
- Recursive namespace, NIIBE Yutaka, 2001/04/23
- Re: Recursive namespace, Keisuke Nishida, 2001/04/24
- Re: Recursive namespace, Alex Shinn, 2001/04/24
- Interface should be determined at compile time, NIIBE Yutaka, 2001/04/24
- Re: Recursive namespace, Marius Vollmer, 2001/04/29
Re: Recursive namespace, Martin Grabmueller, 2001/04/24
Re: Recursive namespace, Keisuke Nishida, 2001/04/24
Re: Recursive namespace, Rob Browning, 2001/04/24
Re: Recursive namespace, Keisuke Nishida, 2001/04/24