[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Gomp-discuss] Release candidate
From: |
Lars Segerlund |
Subject: |
Re: [Gomp-discuss] Release candidate |
Date: |
Tue, 2 Nov 2004 18:41:43 +0100 |
I agree with scott, also if we do the library right we don't have to change
it, some of the language semantics should be handled in the frontends, (
actually all ... ).
If not I do think we would have done a sincerely stupid implementation.
/ Lars Segerlund.
On Tue, 02 Nov 2004 10:21:42 -0500
Scott Robert Ladd <address@hidden> wrote:
> Biagio Lucini wrote:
> > Agreed. Moreover, a merge of the C/C++ and Fortran Specifications is in
> > progress. It is quite likely that OpenMP 3.0 will look pretty much the same
> > for Fortran and C. From our point of view, this means that - in the worst
> > hypothesis - we won't have to write more than one runtime lib :-)
>
> The OpenMP mailing list archive is private to subscribers, but here's
> the pertinent part for those who aren't on that list. From the October
> 2004 newsletter:
>
> [quote]
> * The merge of OpenMP Fortran, C, and C++ specifications is progressing
>
> A "final draft" is now being reviewed by the committee members. There
> are still discussions on how much is flushed when a lock routine is
> called, and on private variables in Fortran statement functions.
> The ARB considers a public review period desirable after the final
> internal review, as it promotes inclusiveness and openness.
> [/quote]
>
> For now, I'm proceeding with the 2.0 specification, since I doubt the
> proposed changes will invalidate too much existing code.
>
> --
> Scott Robert Ladd
> site: http://www.coyotegulch.com
> blog: http://chaoticcoyote.blogspot.com
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Gomp-discuss mailing list
> address@hidden
> http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gomp-discuss
- Re: [Gomp-discuss] Release candidate, (continued)
Re: [Gomp-discuss] Release candidate, Jacob Weismann Poulsen, 2004/11/02
Re: [Gomp-discuss] Release candidate, Diego Novillo, 2004/11/02
Re: [Gomp-discuss] Release candidate, Scott Robert Ladd, 2004/11/02