Re: progress

[Adam Fedor]

On Wednesday, March 26, 2003, at 01:36 PM, Chris B. Vetter wrote:

> On Tue, 25 Mar 2003 21:25:19 -0700
> Adam Fedor <address@hidden> wrote:
> > > However, it would be nice if the main page had a small notice on the
> > > actual release version numbers for stable and unstable. I'm pretty
> > > sure I'm not the only one who lost track...
> > They are listed on the 'Download' page.
>
> *scratch* Maybe I'm blind, but I can't see them anywhere. That's why I
> was asking in the first place ...

Here's an exact URL:

http://wwwmain.gnustep.org/resources/ 
downloads.php?site=ftp%3A%2F%2Fftp.gnustep.org%2Fpub%2Fgnustep

Each package has a 'Stable' and 'Unstable' column


> > > As far as I can tell, stable has higher version numbers than
> > > unstable, right now, 1.6.0 and 0.8.5 (for stable) to 1.5.2 and 0.8.4
> > > (for unstable) ???
> > Not necessarily - It depends on which has been released most recently.
> > Unstable versions have an odd second number (y in x.y.z) for releases
> > greater than version 1.0.0. For releases less than 1.0.0, anything mod
> > 0.0.5 is a stable release.
>
> Ugh. I've been trying to keep track of the versions using two RDF files
> on www.gnustep.us ... so some reliable source would come in handy ...

Actually, after the recent developer confusion with the 0.8.5 release,  
I might just give up on labeling the gui/back versions (at least) as  
being stable or unstable. We'll see.