Re: x15

[Aurélien DESBRIÈRES]

address@hidden (Aurélien DESBRIÈRES) writes:

> Richard Stallman <address@hidden> writes:
>
>> [[[ To any NSA and FBI agents reading my email: please consider    ]]]
>> [[[ whether defending the US Constitution against all enemies,     ]]]
>> [[[ foreign or domestic, requires you to follow Snowden's example. ]]]
>>
>>   > > Why smartphones in particular?...
>>
>>   > Because that's what everybody is buying these days
>>
>> Not everybody.  I value my freedom too much to carry
>> any portable phone.
>>
>> Of course, we want to provide free software to run
>> on the main processor of portable phones.  If people
>> are going to use them, we should help them get as close
>> to freedom as the products permit.  But that is not close
>> enough, and there's no plausible way we can correct that.
>> So we should make sure that distributing free software for
>> them does not appear to legitimize them.
>
> 'as close to freedom as the products permit'
>
> In an electricity network, there is no more freedom, everything can be
> spy from the fact they could now know if you are watching tv or anything
> else. (That is part of the reason they want to know who could help them
> to secure it, to know who is able to do same)
>
>
> 'legetimize them'
>
> Could you kill a GNU?
> That is the same as could the FSF or GNU could legetimize one days the
> rape of the Universal Declaration of Human Right and its article on
> Privacy?
>
> . The preamble
> . Article 2
> . Article 12
> . Article 13
> . Article 18
> . Article 19
> . Article 20
> . Article 26
> . Article 28
> . Article 29
> . Article 30
>
> All of that is rape nowdays in front freedom arround computing,
> electronical and electical form off tools (The Internet of Things) 
>
> But as far as I know (and I don't know very far) I have never hear you,
> GNU or the FSF legetimize these sort of rape.
>
> People at the FSF and arround every project bring their best to reach
> their own counsciousness of freedom.
>
> The rest, have been be raped by some people who have been be erected and
> not elected by the rape of democracy itself.
>
> Lot of people try to prevent and protect freedom in history, but they
> were more free than we are nowadays.
>
> "Those who give up their liberty for more security neither deserve
> liberty nor security." BF
>
> Where is the security in this world when some man who works for the
> "biggest" democracy are ready to make you disappear in torture ways for
> there pleasure if they wish, just because you think they are bad boys.
>
> No, I don't think, but it is right that I have not read the inverse on
> all that fact that the FSF, GNU or you legitimate all of that could be
> considered by some people as 'bad'.


By some other, as not enought, in the dystopian world they are working on.


<#secure method=pgpmime mode=sign>

-- 
Aurelien Desbrieres
We are Human at level 0, we are poor.