[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Why distrust M$, but trust Sun?
From: |
Rick |
Subject: |
Re: Why distrust M$, but trust Sun? |
Date: |
Sat, 28 Jul 2007 12:27:19 -0000 |
User-agent: |
Pan/0.128 (SR/CL: Leitmotiv: Toynbee Idea) |
On Sat, 28 Jul 2007 13:49:32 +0200, Hadron wrote:
> Tim Smith <reply_in_group@mouse-potato.com> writes:
>
>> On 2007-07-27, Alexander Terekhov <terekhov@web.de> wrote:
>>>> It's still managed by people from Sun, and they contribute most of
>>>> the code.
>>>
>>> More to the point:
>>>
>>> http://contributing.openoffice.org/programming.html
>>
>> Yup. It's interesting how many self-proclaimed open source advocates
>> don't seem to actually know anything about what they advocate, other
>> than that it isn't Microsoft and it isn't Apple.
>
> Aint that the truth! Also most of them never contributed one second of
> time to any OSS products.
What have you contributed? And what actions do you consider contributing?
--
Rick
- Re: Why distrust M$, but trust Sun?, (continued)
- Re: Why distrust M$, but trust Sun?, anon, 2007/07/26
- Re: Why distrust M$, but trust Sun?, Jeremy Fisher, 2007/07/26
- Re: Why distrust M$, but trust Sun?, spike1, 2007/07/26
- Re: Why distrust M$, but trust Sun?, Roy Schestowitz, 2007/07/26
- Re: Why distrust M$, but trust Sun?, Tim Smith, 2007/07/26
- Re: Why distrust M$, but trust Sun?, Alexander Terekhov, 2007/07/27
- Re: Why distrust M$, but trust Sun?, Tim Smith, 2007/07/27
- Re: Why distrust M$, but trust Sun?, graeme, 2007/07/28
- Re: Why distrust M$, but trust Sun?, Hadron, 2007/07/28
- Re: Why distrust M$, but trust Sun?,
Rick <=
- Re: Why distrust M$, but trust Sun?, Rick, 2007/07/28
- Re: Why distrust M$, but trust Sun?, Tim Smith, 2007/07/28