[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Why distrust M$, but trust Sun?
From: |
Hadron |
Subject: |
Re: Why distrust M$, but trust Sun? |
Date: |
Sat, 28 Jul 2007 13:49:32 +0200 |
Tim Smith <reply_in_group@mouse-potato.com> writes:
> On 2007-07-27, Alexander Terekhov <terekhov@web.de> wrote:
>>> It's still managed by people from Sun, and they contribute most of the
>>> code.
>>
>> More to the point:
>>
>> http://contributing.openoffice.org/programming.html
>
> Yup. It's interesting how many self-proclaimed open source advocates
> don't seem to actually know anything about what they advocate, other
> than that it isn't Microsoft and it isn't Apple.
Aint that the truth! Also most of them never contributed one second of
time to any OSS products.
- Why distrust M$, but trust Sun?, plenty560, 2007/07/26
- Re: Why distrust M$, but trust Sun?, anon, 2007/07/26
- Re: Why distrust M$, but trust Sun?, Jeremy Fisher, 2007/07/26
- Re: Why distrust M$, but trust Sun?, spike1, 2007/07/26
- Re: Why distrust M$, but trust Sun?, Roy Schestowitz, 2007/07/26
- Re: Why distrust M$, but trust Sun?, Tim Smith, 2007/07/26
- Re: Why distrust M$, but trust Sun?, Alexander Terekhov, 2007/07/27
- Re: Why distrust M$, but trust Sun?, Tim Smith, 2007/07/27
- Re: Why distrust M$, but trust Sun?, graeme, 2007/07/28
- Re: Why distrust M$, but trust Sun?,
Hadron <=
- Re: Why distrust M$, but trust Sun?, Rick, 2007/07/28
- Re: Why distrust M$, but trust Sun?, Rick, 2007/07/28
- Re: Why distrust M$, but trust Sun?, Tim Smith, 2007/07/28