[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: License Dilemma
From: |
Dmitry V. Gorbatovsky |
Subject: |
Re: License Dilemma |
Date: |
Thu, 30 Nov 2006 01:25:30 +0200 |
User-agent: |
KNode/0.10.4 |
Stefaan A Eeckels wrote:
> You will have to decide what it is you have created. If it is software
> (I know you said it isn't), it enjoys copyright protection. This means
> that your software cannot be copied, but the the idea is not protected,
> and can be re-implemented. In addition, software can (in the USA at
> least) be patented - this boils down to protecting the idea and/or
> algorithm.
It is methodology of industrial decision
making under certain conditions.
It is patent penting for two years already through PCT.
> Then you should stipulate so in your license, which will not be the
> GPL as it allows redistribution.
I try to get a point on some particularly well known license
from set of FSF or OSI "approved" licenses.
Which good in situation, where one's intent is to free code of
implementation, but preserve a patent rights.
I would appreciate any clue.
Regards, Dmitry
- Re: License Dilemma, (continued)
- Re: License Dilemma, Dmitry V. Gorbatovsky, 2006/11/29
- Re: License Dilemma, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/11/29
- Re: License Dilemma, Dmitry V. Gorbatovsky, 2006/11/29
- Re: License Dilemma, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2006/11/29
- Message not available
- Re: License Dilemma, Dmitry V. Gorbatovsky, 2006/11/29
- Re: License Dilemma, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2006/11/29
- Message not available
- Re: License Dilemma, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/11/29
- Re: License Dilemma, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2006/11/29
Re: License Dilemma, Dmitry V. Gorbatovsky, 2006/11/29
Re: License Dilemma, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2006/11/30
Message not available
Re: License Dilemma, Dmitry V. Gorbatovsky, 2006/11/30