[GNU Crypto] Re: problem building a GCJ-friendly GNU Crypto

[Mark Wielaard]

Hi all,

On Sat, 2003-09-20 at 21:33, Roger Sayle wrote:
>
> Thanks for the test case.  Looking at it I can immediately guess what
> the problem is: the evaluation order of operands to binary operators.
> A quick check of section 15.7.1 of the Java language specification
> reveals that the semantics are indeed different from C and C++s which
> allow side-effecting operands to be evaluated in arbitrary order.
> 
> I'm currently working on a patch [...]

FYI. I just tried a new checkout of gcc which contains Roger his latest
(workaround) patch for this issue. gnu-crypto compiles out of the box
with this and make check gives 0 failures.

Cheers,

Mark

signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part