[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Gnu-arch-users] Question about bug 8206
From: |
Pedro Perez |
Subject: |
[Gnu-arch-users] Question about bug 8206 |
Date: |
Wed, 27 Sep 2006 18:44:13 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Thunderbird 1.5.0.7 (X11/20060922) |
Hello,
While I was browsing through tla's bug database, I came across bug
number 8206. Basically the bug reports says that "tla changes -H" output
should define what all proper changes identifiers are. For example, and
I quote:
"
tla changes gives an output like
A path/to/file
D path/to/other/file
M this/file/was/modified
The meaning of the letters (A, D, M in this example) is not documented
in tla changes -H, but I think it should be."
I was thinking of creating a patch for this, and submitting it, but
wanted to ask first. Is there a reason to go against such a patch? Are
there better ways to do this? Has this been discussed before and it has
been decided is no good, or just no one has had time to write a patch
(In which case, I will do so)?
Ok, let me know what you guys think, and we will go from there,
--
Pedro Perez
- [Gnu-arch-users] Question about bug 8206,
Pedro Perez <=
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Question about bug 8206, Andy Tai, 2006/09/27
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Question about bug 8206, Thomas Lord, 2006/09/27
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Question about bug 8206, Andy Tai, 2006/09/27
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Question about bug 8206, Pedro Perez, 2006/09/28
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Question about bug 8206, Miles Bader, 2006/09/28
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Question about bug 8206, Andy Tai, 2006/09/29
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Question about bug 8206, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2006/09/29
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Question about bug 8206, Andy Tai, 2006/09/29
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Question about bug 8206, Sylvain Beucler, 2006/09/29
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Question about bug 8206, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2006/09/29