[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Cut of April DVD imminent
From: |
Dustin Sallings |
Subject: |
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Cut of April DVD imminent |
Date: |
Fri, 2 Apr 2004 16:27:35 -0800 |
On Apr 2, 2004, at 15:36, James Blackwell wrote:
That would be anywhere from 5 to 20 times a day that I would have to
add
that header by hand. Frankly it would be easier to set up a procmail
script that /dev/nulls people that habitually cc me and the list.
The simple fact of the matter is that I've got a peeve about people
using
a private medium to post public messages. As my signature implies,
these
messages are unsolicited (otherwise known as spam).
I interpret people sending me a *private* copy of *public* mail as
pretty
darn rude. What's more, I think some people (I'm not going to name
names
here) actually do it out of spite. I can actually *feel* them saying
"Aha!
Here's a chance to stick it to that bastard"
The problem, though, is that you're posting to a public forum with a
Reply-to header that suggests to reply to you privately which takes the
discussion off the list. If you consider your original message public
enough to send it to the public forum with headers suggesting you want
it to become private, that seems a little rude to me.
I'm of the class of people who want the CC. As far as I know, you're
the only one who is adamant about being removed from the To header, so
it's easy for me to remember when I'm responding to an email.
It's inconvenient, though. You're talking about having to manually
add a header 5 to 20 times per day due to a limitation in your reader,
but consider what you're asking everyone else to do. Reply goes to
you, with a Cc to the list in my mail reader (after all, you sent it).
That means I have to remove the to, and then move the Cc to the To to
get the desired effect (and I assume other people have to do similar
when responding to a message from you). Private responses are easier,
but less frequent.
Sometimes I forget, but it's not out of spite. It might save us all
some work if you modified (or configured) your reader to send messages
that indicate your desired reply behavior so that it's all automatic
and nobody has to think about it.
--
Dustin Sallings