[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Bounty for tla on win32
From: |
Tom Lord |
Subject: |
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Bounty for tla on win32 |
Date: |
Mon, 29 Mar 2004 17:39:50 -0800 (PST) |
> From: John F Meinel Jr <address@hidden>
> I also agree with Tom's idea of matching grants. If people want, I don't
> have any problem being a focal point for managing who is paying (for)
> what. But I also won't require that it be me. It might be better to have
> someone like Tom do it, since he is more officially part of the work.
I'm game but only contingent on demand. That is: if you drum up some
people who want to make matching grants of substance, point them at me
and I'll try to work out how to be the coordinator for a modest
facilities fee (in the range of 2.5%..10%). If the amounts are
significant and/or if it is more convenient, then perhaps we can
bypass me and ask the FSF if they would be willing to coordinate (but
I do not speak for the FSF).
> I definitely want this to be an 'official' win32 port, so interoperating
> with Tom is important. I just didn't know how much was going to need to
> be changed to get it to work on win32, and if Tom would allow that into
> tla mainline. If all it ends up being is #ifdef _WIN32 #endif stuff,
> then my guess is it would be fine.
This is a totally nebbishy technical detail but I like to minimize
ifdefs. There's almost always a cleaner solution.
> How to handle multiple people, and best versus first, etc.:
> I think there will need to be a "sign-up period" where I get a list of
> people who are interested. Then amongst the group, we'll need a general
> idea of what needs to be done (this should also involve leroy, Johannes,
> and Tom if possible).
Another consideration is the option of asking people to cooperate.
Long ago, I asked Affero to "factor out" their idea of a paylist
(single payer, multiple recipients) from the rest of their
strangeness. That didn't work out but I still think it's a workable
(if legally intricate) idea.
A dream-future would have my paypal links replaced with pay-list links
that split up contributions amount contributors according to various
criterea. It's a touchy issue because it comes close to operating as
a corporation but, afaict, it's workable.
> Just so people know, I'm thinking < $500 from me. If we get more
> sponsorship, then obviously it will go into the pot as well. And even if
> the whole thing doesn't get done with this amount, at least we'll be a
> lot farther along.
On the topic of matching grants: this is an opportunity for the
informal, anarchist, developer-community equivalent of marketing and
sales. We've had periodic "pings" here on gnu arch users for a while
now from people (some with .com addresses) remarking that windows
support is a critical feature. So, yeah, this is currently a totally
whimsical and ill-formalized sub-project but --- within that context
--- interested folks should chat around and hit up their contacts; see
who might want to play.
"Don't count your chickens before they hatch." -- traditional
-t
- [Gnu-arch-users] Bounty for tla on win32, John F Meinel Jr, 2004/03/29
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Bounty for tla on win32, Robin Green, 2004/03/29
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Bounty for tla on win32, Tom Lord, 2004/03/29
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Bounty for tla on win32, John F Meinel Jr, 2004/03/29
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Bounty for tla on win32, Tom Lord, 2004/03/29
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Bounty for tla on win32, Stig Brautaset, 2004/03/30
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Bounty for tla on win32, Robin Green, 2004/03/30
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Bounty for tla on win32, Stig Brautaset, 2004/03/31
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Bounty for tla on win32, Ron Parker, 2004/03/30
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Bounty for tla on win32, Johannes Berg, 2004/03/30