[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Corrupt pristine tree
|
From: |
Miles Bader |
|
Subject: |
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Corrupt pristine tree |
|
Date: |
Mon, 15 Mar 2004 17:27:39 -0500 |
|
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.3.28i |
On Mon, Mar 15, 2004 at 02:10:35PM -0800, John Meacham wrote:
> Why not use a cryptographic hash? that seems like a much nicer way to
> verify the integrity of the pristine trees and doesn't suffer from the
> device/inode issues that people have with any slightly unusual setup.
'cause it's butt-achingly slow.
-Miles
--
Quidquid latine dictum sit, altum viditur.
[Gnu-arch-users] Re: Corrupt pristine tree, Greek0, 2004/03/13
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Corrupt pristine tree, Anders Rune Jensen, 2004/03/13