Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: libraries / cacherevs

[Miles Bader]

On Thu, Mar 11, 2004 at 10:45:45AM -0500, Stefan Monnier wrote:
> > One thing that's been discussed in the past is to allow some patch-logs
> > to be batched up and stored as compressed-tar-files in the tree (though
> > in the same general location as normal patch-logs), with explicit user
> > commands to batch or unbatch patch-log ranges.
> 
> Lots of manual work.

Why do you say that?  It would probably come down to doing something like
`tla compress-logs X-Y' (perhaps with a older-than-this option) once or twice
a year -- i.e. essentially no work at all.

-Miles
-- 
A zen-buddhist walked into a pizza shop and
said, "Make me one with everything."