[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Gnu-arch-users] Re: Case insensitive file systems [was: tla1.2 on cygwi
From: |
Tom Lord |
Subject: |
[Gnu-arch-users] Re: Case insensitive file systems [was: tla1.2 on cygwin] |
Date: |
Wed, 10 Mar 2004 15:27:29 -0800 (PST) |
> From: Dustin Sallings <address@hidden>
> This was what I was getting at. The categories and branches belong to
> archives, in my mind. Representing them that way in {arch} prevents
> the possibility of them colliding. I think it's the best solution for
> cleanliness and consistency, but I don't claim that it's the only way
> to solve this problem.
It doesn't solve the problem. By coincidence, it works around one
particular case of the problem you've encountered. My 2003b archive
would still trip you up, for example (LabNotes v. labnotes).
-t
- [Gnu-arch-users] Case insensitive file systems [was: tla1.2 on cygwin], Parker, Ron, 2004/03/11
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Case insensitive file systems [was: tla1.2 on cygwin], Dustin Sallings, 2004/03/11
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Case insensitive file systems [was: tla1.2 on cygwin],
Tom Lord <=
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Case insensitive file systems [was: tla1.2 on cygwin], Tom Lord, 2004/03/11
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Case insensitive file systems [was: tla1.2 on cygwin], Tom Lord, 2004/03/11
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Case insensitive file systems [was: tla1.2 on cygwin], Robert Collins, 2004/03/12
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Case insensitive file systems [was: tla1.2 on cygwin], David Brown, 2004/03/13