[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Gnu-arch-users] Re: named patches, patch order, patch queue manager
From: |
Miles Bader |
Subject: |
[Gnu-arch-users] Re: named patches, patch order, patch queue manager |
Date: |
03 Oct 2003 00:56:13 +0900 |
Tom Lord <address@hidden> writes:
> It's not that hard to work with multiple commit-to archives at once
> and, as time has passed, people have been providing little command
> tweaks that make it even easier. So, that gives you a two-level
> namespace and, moreover, one that interacts nicely with units of
> administrivia like mirroring.
I'm not sure how it helps solve what I was complaining about though --
the thing about such `kernel-style' branches would be that there are
_many_ of them, to the degree that the number of names would be a
problem for the maintainer himself, not just others looking at his
archive. I think you might want two namespaces for branch names:
`pending', and `applied', with branches moving between them at different
times (this is what my suggestion of a `hidden' flag was intended to
simulate, in simple, albeit rather ad-hoc, manner).
-Miles
--
`Life is a boundless sea of bitterness'
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: named patches, patch order, patch queue manager (was: the infinite thread), Tobias C. Rittweiler, 2003/10/01
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: named patches, patch order, patch queue manager (was: the infinite thread), Davide Libenzi, 2003/10/01
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: named patches, patch order, patch queue manager, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2003/10/01
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: named patches, patch order, patch queue manager, Davide Libenzi, 2003/10/02
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: named patches, patch order, patch queue manager, Samium Gromoff, 2003/10/02
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: named patches, patch order, patch queue manager, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2003/10/02
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: named patches, patch order, patch queue manager, Miles Bader, 2003/10/02
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: named patches, patch order, patch queue manager, Andrew Suffield, 2003/10/02
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: named patches, patch order, patch queue manager, Miles Bader, 2003/10/02
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: named patches, patch order, patch queue manager, Tom Lord, 2003/10/02
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: named patches, patch order, patch queue manager,
Miles Bader <=
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: named patches, patch order, patch queue manager, Tom Lord, 2003/10/02
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: named patches, patch order, patch queue manager, Miles Bader, 2003/10/02
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: named patches, patch order, patch queue manager, Pau Aliagas, 2003/10/02
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: named patches, patch order, patch queue manager, Miles Bader, 2003/10/02
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: named patches, patch order, patch queue manager, Pau Aliagas, 2003/10/02
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: named patches, patch order, patch queue manager, Miles Bader, 2003/10/02
- [Gnu-arch-users] named patches and "Does Linus matter?", Tom Lord, 2003/10/02
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: named patches and "Does Linus matter?", Davide Libenzi, 2003/10/02
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: named patches and "Does Linus matter?", Tom Lord, 2003/10/02