[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Gnewsense-dev] Re: No xv?
From: |
Yavor Doganov |
Subject: |
[Gnewsense-dev] Re: No xv? |
Date: |
Fri, 05 Mar 2010 19:53:16 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Wanderlust/2.15.5 (Almost Unreal) SEMI/1.14.6 (Maruoka) FLIM/1.14.9 (Gojō) APEL/10.7 Emacs/23.1 (i486-pc-linux-gnu) MULE/6.0 (HANACHIRUSATO) |
> This is not feasible on the long run, as Karl has explained.
>
> I have not seen an explanation, only a statement claiming this is so.
The problem you and all gNS users observe when they do
`aptitude|apt-get install xv' stems from the fact that the `xv'
package (which does not exist in the repository) is declared in
x11-common's Conflicts:. The reliable way to fix this is to rebuild
the `xorg' source package, altering the x11-common's stanza by
removing `xv' from the Conflicts field.
Now, there are other (surgeon-like) ways too, which I'd classify as
"gross hacks" -- unreliable, ugly, invasive, etc.
> If one way is too much work, let's consider others.
It's not too much work; but if I understand correctly Karl Goetz, he
thinks such work is not worth the effort.
- Re: [Gnewsense-dev] No xv?, Richard Stallman, 2010/03/01
- Re: [Gnewsense-dev] No xv?, Karl Goetz, 2010/03/02
- Re: [Gnewsense-dev] No xv?, Richard Stallman, 2010/03/03
- Re: [Gnewsense-dev] No xv?, Karl Goetz, 2010/03/03
- Re: [Gnewsense-dev] No xv?, Richard Stallman, 2010/03/04
- [Gnewsense-dev] Re: No xv?, Yavor Doganov, 2010/03/04
- [Gnewsense-dev] Re: No xv?, Richard Stallman, 2010/03/04
- [Gnewsense-dev] Re: No xv?,
Yavor Doganov <=
- [Gnewsense-dev] Re: No xv?, Richard Stallman, 2010/03/05
- Re: [Gnewsense-dev] Re: No xv?, Irving Rivas, 2010/03/05
- Re: [Gnewsense-dev] Re: No xv?, Richard Stallman, 2010/03/07
- [Gnewsense-dev] Re: No xv?, Yavor Doganov, 2010/03/07
- [Gnewsense-dev] Re: No xv?, Richard Stallman, 2010/03/08
- [Gnewsense-dev] Re: No xv?, Yavor Doganov, 2010/03/08
- [Gnewsense-dev] Re: No xv?, Richard Stallman, 2010/03/09