[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Gnewsense-dev] Re: 2.6.32-libre-lemote vs NetworkManager (race cond
From: |
Wu Zhangjin |
Subject: |
Re: [Gnewsense-dev] Re: 2.6.32-libre-lemote vs NetworkManager (race condition?) |
Date: |
Tue, 22 Dec 2009 11:14:52 +0800 |
On Tue, 2009-12-22 at 00:42 -0200, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
> On Dec 16, 2009, Wu Zhangjin <address@hidden> wrote:
>
> > If your fan is not broken, perhaps you can try to update your EC ROM?
>
> That would be worth a shot. Will you please send me (us?) a pointer to
> it? Thanks in advance.
>
Perhaps you can try this one:
http://dev.lemote.com/code/rt4ls/attachment/wiki/linux-loongson-standby-howto/standby-tools-0.2.tar.gz
2.6.31 is the latest kernel I have tested with the above tool to update
the EC ROM. I have reserved the yeeloong_ecrom module
file(yeeloong_ecrom.c) in the kernel source code, but it will not be
compiled into the kernel even with a module(for it is very dangerous,
which may break the users' machine) except touching the kernel source
code file yourself, but I have never tested it with the latest kernel
after 2.6.31, so, please use 2.6.31 instead.
2.6.32:
arch/mips/loongson/lemote-2f/yeeloong_ecrom.c
If you want it, try to add yeeloong_ecrom.o to
arch/mips/loongson/lemote-2f/Makefile.
2.6.33:
drivers/platform/mips/yeeloong_ecrom.c
> > The latest EC version is PQ1D26.
>
> The machine from Poder Digital, whose fan works fine, reports “PQ1D10”,
> whereas the one from the FSF, that overheats, reports “undefined”.
>
> Both have PMON LM8089-1.4.3.
>
- Re: [Gnewsense-dev] Re: 2.6.32-libre-lemote vs NetworkManager (race condition?), (continued)
- Re: [Gnewsense-dev] Re: 2.6.32-libre-lemote vs NetworkManager (race condition?), Wu Zhangjin, 2009/12/14
- [Gnewsense-dev] Re: 2.6.32-libre-lemote vs NetworkManager (race condition?), Daniel Clark, 2009/12/14
- Re: [Gnewsense-dev] Re: 2.6.32-libre-lemote vs NetworkManager (race condition?), Wu Zhangjin, 2009/12/14
- Re: [Gnewsense-dev] Re: 2.6.32-libre-lemote vs NetworkManager (race condition?), Alexandre Oliva, 2009/12/15
- Re: [Gnewsense-dev] Re: 2.6.32-libre-lemote vs NetworkManager (race condition?), Wu Zhangjin, 2009/12/15
- Re: [Gnewsense-dev] Re: 2.6.32-libre-lemote vs NetworkManager (race condition?), Wu Zhangjin, 2009/12/15
- Re: [Gnewsense-dev] Re: 2.6.32-libre-lemote vs NetworkManager (race condition?), Alexandre Oliva, 2009/12/16
- Re: [Gnewsense-dev] Re: 2.6.32-libre-lemote vs NetworkManager (race condition?), Wu Zhangjin, 2009/12/16
- Re: [Gnewsense-dev] Re: 2.6.32-libre-lemote vs NetworkManager (race condition?), Wu Zhangjin, 2009/12/16
- Re: [Gnewsense-dev] Re: 2.6.32-libre-lemote vs NetworkManager (race condition?), Alexandre Oliva, 2009/12/21
- Re: [Gnewsense-dev] Re: 2.6.32-libre-lemote vs NetworkManager (race condition?),
Wu Zhangjin <=
- Re: [Gnewsense-dev] Re: 2.6.32-libre-lemote vs NetworkManager (race condition?), Alexandre Oliva, 2009/12/23
- Re: [Gnewsense-dev] Re: 2.6.32-libre-lemote vs NetworkManager (race condition?), Wu Zhangjin, 2009/12/23
- [Gnewsense-dev] Re: 2.6.32-libre-lemote vs NetworkManager (race condition?), Daniel Clark, 2009/12/15
- Re: [Gnewsense-dev] Re: 2.6.32-libre-lemote vs NetworkManager (race condition?), Alexandre Oliva, 2009/12/16
- [Gnewsense-dev] Re: 2.6.32-libre-lemote vs NetworkManager (race condition?), Daniel Clark, 2009/12/15
Re: [Gnewsense-dev] Re: 2.6.32-libre-lemote vs NetworkManager (race condition?), Wu Zhangjin, 2009/12/14
Re: [Gnewsense-dev] Re: 2.6.32-libre-lemote vs NetworkManager (race condition?), Sam Geeraerts, 2009/12/15