gcl-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Gcl-devel] Frame stack overflow - limit parameter to increase somew


From: Gunther Schadow
Subject: Re: [Gcl-devel] Frame stack overflow - limit parameter to increase somewhere?
Date: Fri, 05 Dec 2003 17:17:57 -0500
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.5) Gecko/20030924 Thunderbird/0.3

Hi Camm and other GCL developers, thanks, I could now get to
the GCL 2.6.1 version. And I can configure larger stack limits.
However, it turns out that I am not good at guessing how much
I need. I increased everything by a factor of 8 and still
ran into trouble. Problem is it takes 20 minutes or more for it to exhaust its limits, so testing is slow.

I am wondering: would it not be possible to do memory allocation
completely dynamically? I see that you use those FRSSIZE and other *SSIZE constants to dimension actual arrays that are
used for those stacks. Now either I should just max those out
completely or a more graceful way would be to use malloc and
realloc to add pages to those stacks. Hmm, I guess realloc would
over time waste address space in holes. I guess I should just
max those out entirely and let the virtual memory subsystem
take care of the paging.

I wonder how other LISP systems are dealing with this?

regards
-Gunther



Camm Maguire wrote:

Greetings!  Yes, savannah/subversions is apparently down until
tomorrow.  Did you try the utexas url?  This should work.

Take care,

Gunther Schadow <address@hidden> writes:


Camm, this is still a no go:

cvs [login aborted]: connect to subversions.gnu.org(199.232.41.2):2401 failed: 
Connection timed out

traceroute:
 7   121 ms   420 ms   341 ms  206.108.108.213
 8   160 ms   411 ms   310 ms  64.230.223.41
 9   130 ms   200 ms   311 ms  206.108.103.129
10   230 ms   401 ms   310 ms  64.230.242.98
11   331 ms   410 ms   401 ms  206.108.104.170
12   220 ms   411 ms   410 ms  199.235.123.253
13     *        *        *     Request timed out.

seems like the last hop is offline or firewalled?

-Gunther

Camm Maguire wrote:

Greetings!  Unfortunately, ftp.gnu.org is still locked due to the
recent compromise, and to make matters worse, so are the Debian sites.

sounds to me as if there is one of two problems (1) the OS
that both gnu.org and debian is relying on is insecure or (2) there is
just starting to be too much of a monoculture of this OS around so
it's little better that M$ Doors.


--
Gunther Schadow, M.D., Ph.D.                    address@hidden
Medical Information Scientist      Regenstrief Institute for Health Care
Adjunct Assistant Professor        Indiana University School of Medicine
tel:1(317)630-7960                         http://aurora.regenstrief.org









--
Gunther Schadow, M.D., Ph.D.                    address@hidden
Medical Information Scientist      Regenstrief Institute for Health Care
Adjunct Assistant Professor        Indiana University School of Medicine
tel:1(317)630-7960                         http://aurora.regenstrief.org






reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]