[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [ft] FreeType License and patents
From: |
Antoine Leca |
Subject: |
Re: [ft] FreeType License and patents |
Date: |
Mon, 16 Jan 2012 18:51:46 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; fr; rv:1.8.1.24) Gecko/20100228 Thunderbird/2.0.0.24 Mnenhy/0.7.6.0 |
Eric Rannaud écrivit :
> On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 11:16 AM, Dave Crossland <address@hidden> wrote:
>> On 13 January 2012 20:13, Werner LEMBERG <address@hidden> wrote:
>>> I would like to add something similar, with the exception that code
>>> especially marked as patented within the FreeType source code is not
>>> covered.
>>>
>>> Comments?
>> Why not just switch to Apache?
> Apache2 is not compatible with GPLv2
... neither is the FreeType License (FTL), which is the very reason for
the complex licensing if I understand correctly (docs/LICENSE.TXT)
> However, by switching to Apache2, or by adding such a clause, you will
> likely make Freetype harder to use for some projects that may have
> liked the current license better. (e.g. OpenBSD: they don't like
> Apache2, and maybe would reject Freetype license + patent grant.)
Are you sure OpenBSD is using the Freetype library under the FreeType
License (i.e., with explicit attribution a.k.a "advertising")?
Antoine
Re: [ft] [ft-devel] FreeType License and patents, Behdad Esfahbod, 2012/01/16
Re: [ft] [ft-devel] FreeType License and patents, Alexei Podtelezhnikov, 2012/01/19