Re: [ft] First pretest of FreeType 2.1.10

[Adam D. Moss]

Adam D. Moss wrote:
> Reverting just the following change in ftstroke.c
> from 2.1.9->2.1.10 fixes all of my observed regressions:

So the good news is that with the 2.1.9-style sigma,
FT 2.1.10pre is much better than FT 2.1.9 for FT_Glyph_Stroke(),
and no worse than FT 2.1.9 for FT_Glyph_StrokeBorder().

Thanks,
--Adam
--
Adam D. Moss   -   address@hidden