[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Freetype] Re: manual anti-aliasing
From: |
David Chester |
Subject: |
[Freetype] Re: manual anti-aliasing |
Date: |
Wed, 8 May 2002 06:27:32 -0700 (PDT) |
> So why would rastering a large pixel size yield a
> disproportionately smaller
> glyph?
I made an attempt at "manual anti-aliasing" exactly as you described it.
Check the very bottom of the page at www.cs.mcgill.ca/~dchest/xfthack for
example screenshots. That approach seems to work much better with serif
fonts and worse with sans-serif ones.
Leaving hinting enabled could yield slightly unexpected numbers of pixel
rows at smaller sizes. If you aren't calling FT_Load_Glyph with
FT_LOAD_NO_HINTING, try that.
David C.
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Health - your guide to health and wellness
http://health.yahoo.com
- [Freetype] Re: manual anti-aliasing,
David Chester <=