[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Freetype] FreeType 2.0 SNAFU
From: |
Werner LEMBERG |
Subject: |
Re: [Freetype] FreeType 2.0 SNAFU |
Date: |
Thu, 30 Nov 2000 09:13:56 +0100 (CET) |
> > > Why /usr/local/include/freetype2/freetype and not simply
> > > /usr/local/include/freetype2 ?
> >
> > On Unix, the final location really doesn't matter IMHO due to the
> > `freetype-config' script. Since we don't have `install' targets for
> > other platforms, David's quick solution doesn't really hurt.
>
> while it may work, I still consider it more clean if it can be
> installed in standard places. Given that the above decision was
> based on time constraints, wouldn't it be a good idea to change
> that now, *before* the next minor release ?
Well, yes, I agree. I can do the appropriate changes -- to be 8+3
compliant, I suggest `freetype.2' as the directory name (note the
dot). This makes FT2 a bit unique, but it works :-)
`ft2' is already in use for something different in the Dos/Windows
world...
Werner
- [Freetype] FreeType 2.0 SNAFU, Bob Friesenhahn, 2000/11/29
- Re: [Freetype] FreeType 2.0 SNAFU, Werner LEMBERG, 2000/11/29
- Re: [Freetype] FreeType 2.0 SNAFU, Stefan Seefeld, 2000/11/29
- Re: [Freetype] FreeType 2.0 SNAFU, Werner LEMBERG, 2000/11/29
- Re: [Freetype] FreeType 2.0 SNAFU, Stefan Seefeld, 2000/11/29
- Re: [Freetype] FreeType 2.0 SNAFU,
Werner LEMBERG <=
- Re: [Freetype] FreeType 2.0 SNAFU, Stefan Seefeld, 2000/11/30
- Re: [Freetype] FreeType 2.0 SNAFU, Werner LEMBERG, 2000/11/30
- Re: [Freetype] FreeType 2.0 SNAFU, Bob Friesenhahn, 2000/11/30
- Re: [Freetype] FreeType 2.0 SNAFU, Werner LEMBERG, 2000/11/30
- Re: [Freetype] FreeType 2.0 SNAFU, Bob Friesenhahn, 2000/11/30
- Re: [Freetype] FreeType 2.0 SNAFU, David Turner, 2000/11/30
- Re: [Freetype] FreeType 2.0 SNAFU, Werner LEMBERG, 2000/11/30