[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Freetype] FreeType 2.0 SNAFU
From: |
Werner LEMBERG |
Subject: |
Re: [Freetype] FreeType 2.0 SNAFU |
Date: |
Wed, 29 Nov 2000 22:59:06 +0100 (CET) |
> what was the reason to put the headers into
> /usr/local/include/freetype2/freetype and not simply
> /usr/local/include/freetype2 ?
It was a last-minute fix from David before the 2.0 release. It's
quite unfortunate, I know, but using `/usr/local/include/freetype2'
had caused changes in almost all FreeType source code files.
On Unix, the final location really doesn't matter IMHO due to the
`freetype-config' script. Since we don't have `install' targets for
other platforms, David's quick solution doesn't really hurt.
Werner
- [Freetype] FreeType 2.0 SNAFU, Bob Friesenhahn, 2000/11/29
- Re: [Freetype] FreeType 2.0 SNAFU, Werner LEMBERG, 2000/11/29
- Re: [Freetype] FreeType 2.0 SNAFU, Stefan Seefeld, 2000/11/29
- Re: [Freetype] FreeType 2.0 SNAFU,
Werner LEMBERG <=
- Re: [Freetype] FreeType 2.0 SNAFU, Stefan Seefeld, 2000/11/29
- Re: [Freetype] FreeType 2.0 SNAFU, Werner LEMBERG, 2000/11/30
- Re: [Freetype] FreeType 2.0 SNAFU, Stefan Seefeld, 2000/11/30
- Re: [Freetype] FreeType 2.0 SNAFU, Werner LEMBERG, 2000/11/30
- Re: [Freetype] FreeType 2.0 SNAFU, Bob Friesenhahn, 2000/11/30
- Re: [Freetype] FreeType 2.0 SNAFU, Werner LEMBERG, 2000/11/30
- Re: [Freetype] FreeType 2.0 SNAFU, Bob Friesenhahn, 2000/11/30
- Re: [Freetype] FreeType 2.0 SNAFU, David Turner, 2000/11/30
- Re: [Freetype] FreeType 2.0 SNAFU, Werner LEMBERG, 2000/11/30