freetype-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [ft-devel] [freetype-2.9.1] FT_Init_FreeType is missing with cc on S


From: suzuki toshiya
Subject: Re: [ft-devel] [freetype-2.9.1] FT_Init_FreeType is missing with cc on Solaris x64
Date: Fri, 04 May 2018 08:40:16 +0900
User-agent: Mozilla-Thunderbird 2.0.0.24 (X11/20100329)

Dear Kanazawa-san,

Thanks for confirmation! Maybe I would have to ask for your reconfirmation
after polishing up the patch, after a while. Please keep in touch.

mpsuzuki

Kiyoshi KANAZAWA wrote:
> Dear Suzuki san,
> 
> Your patch solved the problem.
> Tested both with
> - ./configure CC="cc -m64"
> % nm objs/.libs/libfreetype.so.6.16.1 | grep FT_Init_FreeType
> [2394]  |    355488|       123|FUNC |GLOB |0    |17     |FT_Init_FreeType
> 
> - ./configure CC="cc -m32"
> % nm objs/.libs/libfreetype.so.6.16.1 | grep FT_Init_FreeType
> [2398]  |    185536|       148|FUNC |GLOB |0    |15     |FT_Init_FreeType
> 
> 
> Best regards,
> 
> --- Kiyoshi
> 
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: suzuki toshiya <address@hidden>
> To: Kiyoshi KANAZAWA <address@hidden>
> Cc: freetype-devel <address@hidden>
> Date: 2018/5/3, Thu 23:49
> Subject: Re: [ft-devel] [freetype-2.9.1] FT_Init_FreeType is missing with cc 
> on Solaris x64
> 
> Maybe
>     __attribute__((visibility("__global"))) foo
> is wrong, and
>     __global foo
> would be correct. also I guess
>     __attribute__((visibility("default"))) foo
> is acceptable for Oracle cc too.
> 
> I uploaded the revised tarball (revised patch is attached).
> No need to try immediately :-)
> 
> suzuki toshiya wrote:
>> Dear Kanazawa-san,
>>
>> Thanks!
>>
>> Kiyoshi KANAZAWA wrote:
>>> Dear Suzuki san,
>>>
>>> Tried to build freetype-2.9.1-sunpro, but failed.
>>> Log files are attached.
>>>
>>> I'm going to bed, now.
>>> See you again, tomorrow.
>>> Regards,
>>>
>>> --- Kiyoshi
>>>
>>>
>>> ----- Original Message -----
>>> From: suzuki toshiya <address@hidden<mailto:address@hidden>>
>>> To: Alexei Podtelezhnikov <address@hidden<mailto:address@hidden>>; Kiyoshi 
>>> KANAZAWA <address@hidden<mailto:address@hidden>>
>>> Cc: freetype-devel <address@hidden<mailto:address@hidden>>
>>> Date: 2018/5/3, Thu 23:09
>>> Subject: Re: [ft-devel] [freetype-2.9.1] FT_Init_FreeType is missing with 
>>> cc on Solaris x64
>>>
>>> Dear Alexei, Kanazawa-san,
>>>
>>> Here is the patch trying to use visibility options on SunPro.
>>> Also patched tarball is uploaded at:
>>>
>>> http://gyvern.ipc.hiroshima-u.ac.jp/~mpsuzuki/freetype-2.9.1-sunpro.tar.gz
>>>
>>> This is completely untested on SunPro, there might be silly
>>> mistakes, but I hope anybody can try.
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>> mpsuzuki
>>>
>>> suzuki toshiya wrote:
>>>> Alexei Podtelezhnikov wrote:
>>>>>> Thus, attribute visibility is only enabled for GCC >= 4.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Comparing with configure.raw, I guess you assumed that
>>>>>> -fvisibility is GCC-specific feature?
>>>>> Solaris compiler would natively need -xldscope=hidden and __global
>>>>> attribute, according to
>>>>> http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/server-storage/solaris/symbol-scope-140496.html
>>>> The values of attribute-visibility would be compatible with
>>>> GNU style, according to
>>>> https://docs.oracle.com/cd/E19205-01/821-2496/bjabi/index.html
>>>> please find 2.9.
>>>>
>>>>> -fvisibility is GNU so Solaris had better define __GNUC__. Oh well.
>>>> According to configure.log.xz by Kanazawa-san, Oracle cc
>>>> (pretends to as if it) supports -fvisibility.
>>>> Anyway, I have no objection to write Sun style explicitly.
>>>>
>>>> Regards,
>>>> mpsuzuki
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Freetype-devel mailing list
>>>> address@hidden<mailto:address@hidden><mailto:address@hidden<mailto:address@hidden>>
>>>> https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/freetype-devel
>>>>
>>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Freetype-devel mailing list
>> address@hidden<mailto:address@hidden>
>> https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/freetype-devel
>>
> 
> 
> 




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]