[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [ft-devel] [GSoC] Extending the CF2 interpreter
From: |
Nikolaus Waxweiler |
Subject: |
Re: [ft-devel] [GSoC] Extending the CF2 interpreter |
Date: |
Tue, 4 Jul 2017 17:29:13 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.2.1 |
> Also, if possible, could you suggest a good CFF font for testing
> changes? Right now, I'm using one from Google Fonts but it looks wonky
> when hinted at small sizes, even on master branch. Perhaps there is
> some font the appearance of which is already familiar to you (and
> hence any regressions are more apparent) ?
You can use http://git.ghostscript.com/?p=urw-core35-fonts.git to test
things. URW++ provided Type1, CFF and TTF versions of the base
Postscript fonts. The Type 1 fonts even had more than 256 glyphs per
font last time I checked. The quality of the fonts is... ho-hum. The
hinting (and by extension, the outlines) is off sometimes. But maybe
it's enough for testing :)
- Re: [ft-devel] [GSoC] Extending the CF2 interpreter, Ewald Hew, 2017/07/04
- Re: [ft-devel] [GSoC] Extending the CF2 interpreter,
Nikolaus Waxweiler <=
- Re: [ft-devel] [GSoC] Extending the CF2 interpreter, Werner LEMBERG, 2017/07/04
- Re: [ft-devel] [GSoC] Extending the CF2 interpreter, Ewald Hew, 2017/07/04
- Re: [ft-devel] [GSoC] Extending the CF2 interpreter, Werner LEMBERG, 2017/07/05
- Re: [ft-devel] [GSoC] Extending the CF2 interpreter, Ewald Hew, 2017/07/05
- Re: [ft-devel] [GSoC] Extending the CF2 interpreter, Werner LEMBERG, 2017/07/05
- Re: [ft-devel] [GSoC] Extending the CF2 interpreter, Ewald Hew, 2017/07/06
- Re: [ft-devel] [GSoC] Extending the CF2 interpreter, Werner LEMBERG, 2017/07/06
- Re: [ft-devel] [GSoC] Extending the CF2 interpreter, Ewald Hew, 2017/07/10
- Re: [ft-devel] [GSoC] Extending the CF2 interpreter, Werner LEMBERG, 2017/07/10