[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [ft-devel] Taming CFF_CONFIG_OPTION_DARKENING_PARAMETER_Y* for a gam
From: |
Behdad Esfahbod |
Subject: |
Re: [ft-devel] Taming CFF_CONFIG_OPTION_DARKENING_PARAMETER_Y* for a gamma of ~2.2/sRGB? |
Date: |
Tue, 25 Aug 2015 16:40:27 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.8.0 |
On 15-08-25 04:30 PM, Alexei Podtelezhnikov wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 25, 2015 at 10:42 AM, Behdad Esfahbod
> <address@hidden> wrote:
>> On 15-08-25 03:29 PM, Werner LEMBERG wrote:
>>>
>>> On the other hand: How many recent fonts in the wild have such
>>> misformed glyphs?
>>
>> I saw one when developing GLyphy. Note that these are valid fonts according
>> to TrueType spec. They just don't follow the "recommended" outline
>> winding...
>>
>> Perhaps it's ok to ignore these. Just something to know is possible.
>
> For the record, Windows 7 rejects this font.
That's probably because my subsetter was too aggressive...
> If this mistake was made
> in the letter 'O' it wold not be rendered correctly by FreeType. So
> this glyph *happens* to render correctly just because the outlines are
> not nested.
Sure. That's the whole point of non-zero-winding fill rune.
> Testing for this is easier said than done. It easier to
> fix the font.
lol. True. We have to fix these in GLyphy however...
b
- Re: [ft-devel] Taming CFF_CONFIG_OPTION_DARKENING_PARAMETER_Y* for a gamma of ~2.2/sRGB?, (continued)
- Re: [ft-devel] Taming CFF_CONFIG_OPTION_DARKENING_PARAMETER_Y* for a gamma of ~2.2/sRGB?, Werner LEMBERG, 2015/08/19
- Re: [ft-devel] Taming CFF_CONFIG_OPTION_DARKENING_PARAMETER_Y* for a gamma of ~2.2/sRGB?, Nikolaus Waxweiler, 2015/08/20
- Re: [ft-devel] Taming CFF_CONFIG_OPTION_DARKENING_PARAMETER_Y* for a gamma of ~2.2/sRGB?, Behdad Esfahbod, 2015/08/21
- Re: [ft-devel] Taming CFF_CONFIG_OPTION_DARKENING_PARAMETER_Y* for a gamma of ~2.2/sRGB?, Alexei Podtelezhnikov, 2015/08/21
- Re: [ft-devel] Taming CFF_CONFIG_OPTION_DARKENING_PARAMETER_Y* for a gamma of ~2.2/sRGB?, Behdad Esfahbod, 2015/08/21
- Re: [ft-devel] Taming CFF_CONFIG_OPTION_DARKENING_PARAMETER_Y* for a gamma of ~2.2/sRGB?, Werner LEMBERG, 2015/08/21
- Re: [ft-devel] Taming CFF_CONFIG_OPTION_DARKENING_PARAMETER_Y* for a gamma of ~2.2/sRGB?, Behdad Esfahbod, 2015/08/23
- Re: [ft-devel] Taming CFF_CONFIG_OPTION_DARKENING_PARAMETER_Y* for a gamma of ~2.2/sRGB?, Werner LEMBERG, 2015/08/25
- Re: [ft-devel] Taming CFF_CONFIG_OPTION_DARKENING_PARAMETER_Y* for a gamma of ~2.2/sRGB?, Behdad Esfahbod, 2015/08/25
- Re: [ft-devel] Taming CFF_CONFIG_OPTION_DARKENING_PARAMETER_Y* for a gamma of ~2.2/sRGB?, Alexei Podtelezhnikov, 2015/08/25
- Re: [ft-devel] Taming CFF_CONFIG_OPTION_DARKENING_PARAMETER_Y* for a gamma of ~2.2/sRGB?,
Behdad Esfahbod <=
- Re: [ft-devel] Taming CFF_CONFIG_OPTION_DARKENING_PARAMETER_Y* for a gamma of ~2.2/sRGB?, Nikolaus Waxweiler, 2015/08/21
- Re: [ft-devel] Taming CFF_CONFIG_OPTION_DARKENING_PARAMETER_Y* for a gamma of ~2.2/sRGB?, Behdad Esfahbod, 2015/08/23
- Re: [ft-devel] Taming CFF_CONFIG_OPTION_DARKENING_PARAMETER_Y* for a gamma of ~2.2/sRGB?, Werner LEMBERG, 2015/08/23
- Re: [ft-devel] Taming CFF_CONFIG_OPTION_DARKENING_PARAMETER_Y* for a gamma of ~2.2/sRGB?, Alexei Podtelezhnikov, 2015/08/23
- Re: [ft-devel] Taming CFF_CONFIG_OPTION_DARKENING_PARAMETER_Y* for a gamma of ~2.2/sRGB?, Werner LEMBERG, 2015/08/23
- Re: [ft-devel] Taming CFF_CONFIG_OPTION_DARKENING_PARAMETER_Y* for a gamma of ~2.2/sRGB?, Behdad Esfahbod, 2015/08/24
- Re: [ft-devel] Taming CFF_CONFIG_OPTION_DARKENING_PARAMETER_Y* for a gamma of ~2.2/sRGB?, Werner LEMBERG, 2015/08/24
- Re: [ft-devel] Taming CFF_CONFIG_OPTION_DARKENING_PARAMETER_Y* for a gamma of ~2.2/sRGB?, Alexei Podtelezhnikov, 2015/08/24
- Re: [ft-devel] Taming CFF_CONFIG_OPTION_DARKENING_PARAMETER_Y* for a gamma of ~2.2/sRGB?, Behdad Esfahbod, 2015/08/24
- Re: [ft-devel] Taming CFF_CONFIG_OPTION_DARKENING_PARAMETER_Y* for a gamma of ~2.2/sRGB?, Alexei Podtelezhnikov, 2015/08/24