[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [ft-devel] Understanding Type1 fonts
From: |
Donn |
Subject: |
Re: [ft-devel] Understanding Type1 fonts |
Date: |
Wed, 9 Jan 2008 11:14:19 +0200 |
User-agent: |
KMail/1.9.6 (enterprise 0.20070907.709405) |
On Wednesday, 09 January 2008 10:51:47 address@hidden wrote:
> In my understanding, AFM and PFM are not essential for
> the system
Ok +1 vote for "AFM and PFM" as non-essential to a Gnu/Linux system.
Thanks for the info. It sounds like PFB and PFA files are enough on their own
and obscure use-cases are not something I want to start covering until I get
much clearer information.
\d
- [ft-devel] Understanding Type1 fonts, Donn, 2008/01/09
- Re: [ft-devel] Understanding Type1 fonts, mpsuzuki, 2008/01/09
- Re: [ft-devel] Understanding Type1 fonts,
Donn <=
- Re: [ft-devel] Understanding Type1 fonts, Dmitry Timoshkov, 2008/01/09
- Re: [ft-devel] Understanding Type1 fonts, Donn, 2008/01/09
- Re: [ft-devel] Understanding Type1 fonts, Dmitry Timoshkov, 2008/01/09
- Re: [ft-devel] Understanding Type1 fonts, Donn, 2008/01/09
- Re: [ft-devel] Understanding Type1 fonts, Dmitry Timoshkov, 2008/01/09
- Re: [ft-devel] Understanding Type1 fonts, Werner LEMBERG, 2008/01/09
- Re: [ft-devel] Understanding Type1 fonts, Donn, 2008/01/09
- Re: [ft-devel] Understanding Type1 fonts, mpsuzuki, 2008/01/09
- Re: [ft-devel] Understanding Type1 fonts, Donn, 2008/01/09
- Re: [ft-devel] Understanding Type1 fonts, Werner LEMBERG, 2008/01/09