Re: [pooma-dev] Using gcc3.0 to compile POOMA

[Jeffrey D. Oldham]

On Fri, Jan 03, 2003 at 02:11:41PM +0100, Richard Guenther wrote:
> On Fri, 3 Jan 2003, Richard Guenther wrote:
> 
> Luck we are - with todays CVS of gcc 3.2 the failures are reduced, but not
> completely away (the just +PASSED lines are tests that segfaulted before):
> 
> +PASSED ... array_test7
> +PASSED ... array_test8
> -FAILED ... array_test18
> +PASSED ... array_test18
> +PASSED ... array_test19
> +PASSED ... IteratorPairDomainTest
> +PASSED ... brick_test2
> +PASSED ... brick_test3
> +PASSED ... brickview_test2
> +PASSED ... ump_test4: guard cell fill test.
> +PASSED ... ump_test5: guard cell fill test.
> -FAILED ... ump_test8
> +PASSED ... ump_test8
> +PASSED ... ump_test9: dirty flag test.
> +PASSED ... gmp_test4 (Guard cell fill test)
> -FAILED ... ReductionTest1
> +PASSED ... ReductionTest1
> +PASSED ... LocalPatch
> -FAILED ... ScalarCode
> +PASSED ... ScalarCode
> +PASSED ... rngArray
> +PASSED ... GridLayout operations
> +PASSED ... UniformGridLayout operations
> +PASSED ... Particles with spatial layout
> +PASSED ... Particles with uniform layout
> +PASSED ... TestTrace
> +PASSED ... TestTranspose
> +PASSED ... GridBroadcast Test

This is good news.

Mark Mitchell (address@hidden) recently checked in a complete
revision of gcc's C++ parser.  Also, the compiler now passes almost
all of CodeSourcery's C++ ABI Testsuite because of work by Nathan
Sidwell (address@hidden) of CodeSourcery, LLC.

Thanks,
Jeffrey D. Oldham
address@hidden