Re: [pooma-dev] Using gcc3.0 to compile POOMA

[Richard Guenther]

On Fri, 3 Jan 2003, Richard Guenther wrote:

> On 3 Jan 2003, Tarjei Knapstad wrote:
>
> > On Thu, 2002-12-19 at 16:59, Richard Guenther wrote:
> > > On Thu, 19 Dec 2002, Richard Guenther wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hi!
> > > >
> > > > I was just using gcc3.0 (CVS head) for POOMA and now noticed that
> > > > even at -O the NearestNeighbors test from the Field testsuite is
> > > > failing (works at -O0).
> > >
> > > Same problem with current gcc3.2 CVS (-O2 -fomit-frame-pointer
> > > -march=athlon) :/
> > >
> > Those nasties in 3.0 are apparently fixed in 3.2. Have you tried running
>
> No - I see lots of extra failures on powerpc comapred to a ia32 run.

Luck we are - with todays CVS of gcc 3.2 the failures are reduced, but not
completely away (the just +PASSED lines are tests that segfaulted before):

+PASSED ... array_test7
+PASSED ... array_test8
-FAILED ... array_test18
+PASSED ... array_test18
+PASSED ... array_test19
+PASSED ... IteratorPairDomainTest
+PASSED ... brick_test2
+PASSED ... brick_test3
+PASSED ... brickview_test2
+PASSED ... ump_test4: guard cell fill test.
+PASSED ... ump_test5: guard cell fill test.
-FAILED ... ump_test8
+PASSED ... ump_test8
+PASSED ... ump_test9: dirty flag test.
+PASSED ... gmp_test4 (Guard cell fill test)
-FAILED ... ReductionTest1
+PASSED ... ReductionTest1
+PASSED ... LocalPatch
-FAILED ... ScalarCode
+PASSED ... ScalarCode
+PASSED ... rngArray
+PASSED ... GridLayout operations
+PASSED ... UniformGridLayout operations
+PASSED ... Particles with spatial layout
+PASSED ... Particles with uniform layout
+PASSED ... TestTrace
+PASSED ... TestTranspose
+PASSED ... GridBroadcast Test