|
| From: | James Crotinger |
| Subject: | RE: [pooma-dev] std:: Policy for PoomaOps.in? |
| Date: | Thu, 5 Jul 2001 14:18:39 -0600 |
> This is probably a rare occurrence, but, one that should be
> considered. Actually, its pretty close to time for Pooma to enter the
> namespace world, don't you think?
> John Hall
Not until everyone has Koenig lookup implemented correctly.
Actually, some stuff in Pooma (mostly later stuff that doesn't deal with _expression_ templates) is in the Pooma:: namespace. But putting template functions in the Pooma namespace would be a pain in the rear (for users) unless the namespace lookup stuff is done right. I think KCC 4.0 was supposed to do this right, but that's a fairly recent development. I don't know about GCC, MetroWerks, SGI CC, etc.
Jim
| [Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |