Re: [emms-help] 4.2 release tasks: emms-print-metadata install

[Alex Kost]

Yoni Rabkin (2016-12-05 12:39 -0500) wrote:

>>> And installing a binary on the user's system by default doesn't sound
>>> right to me when they are compiling and installing an elisp package;
>>> it isn't expected behavior.
>>
>> I disagree with this: when I run "make", I expect that the full
>> software will be built, not just a part of it (I mean only *.el
>> files), so my opinion is that 'emms-print-metadata' should be built by
>> default, but you are the boss here :-)
>
> Well, no. I'm just the current maintainer.

Yeah, sorry, I meant that you have a final decision.

> Everyone, please write in with your opinions so that we can decide what
> to do with this. If everyone thinks make should compile and install
> `emms-print-metadata' then that is what we'll do.
>
> P.S. Alex, how about write access to the Emms git repo?

For me?  Well, thanks, it would be honor; but isn't it too early?  Since
I've never even contributed to EMMS.

-- 
Alex