[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: fringe arrow conflict between compile and gud?
From: |
Nick Roberts |
Subject: |
Re: fringe arrow conflict between compile and gud? |
Date: |
Wed, 30 Mar 2005 10:03:08 +1200 |
> > I don't use more than one arrow per buffer. However, I do think compile
> > should use overlay-arrow-variable-list instead of making
> > overlay-arrow-position a local variable.
>
> And so should GUD, although overlay-arrow-position was probably
> invented/reserved for GUD originally.
OK, I've done this. To work properly, it needs your change:
KFS> Try removing this line in xdisp.c to see if it has the desired
KFS> effect:
KFS>
KFS> overlay_arrow_seen = 1;
Nick
- Re: fringe arrow conflict between compile and gud?, (continued)
Re: fringe arrow conflict between compile and gud?, Juri Linkov, 2005/03/29
Re: fringe arrow conflict between compile and gud?, Juri Linkov, 2005/03/29
Re: fringe arrow conflict between compile and gud?, Nick Roberts, 2005/03/29
Re: fringe arrow conflict between compile and gud?, JUAN-LEON Lahoz Garcia, 2005/03/29
Re: fringe arrow conflict between compile and gud?, Kim F. Storm, 2005/03/29
Re: fringe arrow conflict between compile and gud?,
Nick Roberts <=
Re: fringe arrow conflict between compile and gud?, Kim F. Storm, 2005/03/29
Re: fringe arrow conflict between compile and gud?, Nick Roberts, 2005/03/30
Re: fringe arrow conflict between compile and gud?, Kim F. Storm, 2005/03/30
Re: fringe arrow conflict between compile and gud?, Juri Linkov, 2005/03/31
Re: fringe arrow conflict between compile and gud?, Richard Stallman, 2005/03/31
Re: fringe arrow conflict between compile and gud?, Richard Stallman, 2005/03/31
Re: fringe arrow conflict between compile and gud?, Nick Roberts, 2005/03/31
Re: fringe arrow conflict between compile and gud?, Juri Linkov, 2005/03/31
Re: fringe arrow conflict between compile and gud?, Juri Linkov, 2005/03/31
Re: fringe arrow conflict between compile and gud?, Nick Roberts, 2005/03/31