[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: undo mechanism (was Re: turning off (or enhancing) a couple of new f
From: |
Richard Stallman |
Subject: |
Re: undo mechanism (was Re: turning off (or enhancing) a couple of new features) |
Date: |
Mon, 28 Mar 2005 17:54:32 -0500 |
The messages also seem to appear when I edit (using emacs lisp) a file
that is only ~700k in size (at the end of the day), but in which I'm
doing a lot of programmed manipulation.
I can see why it might happen in that kind of case.
To deal with this, when I'm doing a lot of programmatic editing, I
just turn undo off.
That might in fact be the best thing to do.
Do you find it is useful for this programmed manipulation to save undo
elements? Should it attempt to optimize its undo elements?
- turning off (or enhancing) a couple of new features, Joe Corneli, 2005/03/25
- Re: turning off (or enhancing) a couple of new features, Luc Teirlinck, 2005/03/26
- Re: turning off (or enhancing) a couple of new features, Joe Corneli, 2005/03/26
- Re: turning off (or enhancing) a couple of new features, Luc Teirlinck, 2005/03/26
- undo mechanism (was Re: turning off (or enhancing) a couple of new features), Joe Corneli, 2005/03/26
- Re: undo mechanism (was Re: turning off (or enhancing) a couple of new features), Luc Teirlinck, 2005/03/26
- Re: undo mechanism, Stefan Monnier, 2005/03/26
- Re: undo mechanism, Luc Teirlinck, 2005/03/26
- Re: undo mechanism, Richard Stallman, 2005/03/28
- Re: undo mechanism, Luc Teirlinck, 2005/03/26
- Re: undo mechanism (was Re: turning off (or enhancing) a couple of new features),
Richard Stallman <=
- Re: turning off (or enhancing) a couple of new features, Richard Stallman, 2005/03/28
- Re: turning off (or enhancing) a couple of new features, Joe Corneli, 2005/03/28
- Re: turning off (or enhancing) a couple of new features, Richard Stallman, 2005/03/28
Re: turning off (or enhancing) a couple of new features, Luc Teirlinck, 2005/03/26