[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: poor additions in quail/latin-ltx
From: |
Kenichi Handa |
Subject: |
Re: poor additions in quail/latin-ltx |
Date: |
Fri, 25 Mar 2005 14:28:16 +0900 (JST) |
User-agent: |
SEMI/1.14.3 (Ushinoya) FLIM/1.14.2 (Yagi-Nishiguchi) APEL/10.2 Emacs/22.0.50 (sparc-sun-solaris2.6) MULE/5.0 (SAKAKI) |
In article <address@hidden>, Dave Love <address@hidden> writes:
> Kenichi Handa <address@hidden> writes:
>> And, what to do with the followings? Doesn't babel table
>> contain mnemonics for them?
> The problem with the Babel ones is that they are somewhat obscure.
> For instance, they don't appear in the big compilation of LaTeX
> symbols. Of course, it's rather difficult to know or remember the
> LaTeX names anyhow... Apart from tabular methods, it would be useful
> to have completion on Unicode names, but I didn't get round to
> devising an efficient way of doing it with partial completion on the
> constituent words of the names. E.g. completion on `quotation' should
> allow selection from the set of quotation marks.
How about enabling quail-completion on using "TeX" input
method as below? I think it's rare to use TAB while editing
a TeX/LaTeX file, thus using it for quail-completion is ok
while typing some letter.
(quail-define-package
"TeX" "UTF-8" "\\" t
"LaTeX-like input method for many characters.
These characters are from the charsets used by the `utf-8' coding
system, including many technical ones. Examples:
\\'a -> á \\`{a} -> à
\\pi -> π \\int -> ∫ ^1 -> ¹"
'(("\t" . quail-completion))
t t nil nil nil nil nil nil nil t)
---
Ken'ichi HANDA
address@hidden
- Re: poor additions in quail/latin-ltx, (continued)
- Re: poor additions in quail/latin-ltx, Stefan Monnier, 2005/03/18
- Re: poor additions in quail/latin-ltx, Dave Love, 2005/03/24
- Re: poor additions in quail/latin-ltx, Stefan, 2005/03/24
- Re: poor additions in quail/latin-ltx, Dave Love, 2005/03/25
- Re: poor additions in quail/latin-ltx, Stefan Monnier, 2005/03/25
- Re: poor additions in quail/latin-ltx, Kenichi Handa, 2005/03/16
- Re: poor additions in quail/latin-ltx, Dave Love, 2005/03/24
- Re: poor additions in quail/latin-ltx,
Kenichi Handa <=
- Re: poor additions in quail/latin-ltx, Dave Love, 2005/03/25
- Re: poor additions in quail/latin-ltx, Kenichi Handa, 2005/03/26