[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: poor additions in quail/latin-ltx
From: |
Kenichi Handa |
Subject: |
Re: poor additions in quail/latin-ltx |
Date: |
Wed, 16 Mar 2005 21:09:53 +0900 (JST) |
User-agent: |
SEMI/1.14.3 (Ushinoya) FLIM/1.14.2 (Yagi-Nishiguchi) APEL/10.2 Emacs/21.3.50 (sparc-sun-solaris2.6) MULE/5.0 (SAKAKI) |
In article <address@hidden>, Dave Love <address@hidden> writes:
> Reiner Steib <address@hidden> writes:
>> \glq, \glqq, ... are defined in the babel LaTeX package (see "texdoc
>> babel", table 4 or babel/babel.def and babel/*.ldf).
> Ah, that explains why I couldn't find them under texmf/tex/latex --
> it's years since I looked at Babel.
Does it mean that we don't have to change those lines in
latin-ltx.el?
And, what to do with the followings? Doesn't babel table
contain mnemonics for them?
> I'd also like these added. Some are alternative names for characters
> which are already present. Some of the names aren't in standard LaTeX
> but come from the ISO standard for Z.
> \texttrademark ™
> \textquoteright ’
> \textquoteleft ‘
> \dots …
> \nat ℕ
> \power ℙ
> \textquotedblleft “
> \textquotedblright ”
> \ndres ⩤
> \nrres ⩥
> \cent ¢
> \brokenvert ¦
> \degree °
> \rbbbrack ⟦
> \lbbbrack ⟧
---
Ken'ichi HANDA
address@hidden
- Re: poor additions in quail/latin-ltx, (continued)
- Re: poor additions in quail/latin-ltx, Dave Love, 2005/03/24
- Re: poor additions in quail/latin-ltx, Stefan, 2005/03/24
- Re: poor additions in quail/latin-ltx, Dave Love, 2005/03/25
- Re: poor additions in quail/latin-ltx, Stefan Monnier, 2005/03/18
- Re: poor additions in quail/latin-ltx, Dave Love, 2005/03/24
- Re: poor additions in quail/latin-ltx, Stefan, 2005/03/24
- Re: poor additions in quail/latin-ltx, Dave Love, 2005/03/25
- Re: poor additions in quail/latin-ltx, Stefan Monnier, 2005/03/25
- Re: poor additions in quail/latin-ltx,
Kenichi Handa <=
- Re: poor additions in quail/latin-ltx, Dave Love, 2005/03/24
- Re: poor additions in quail/latin-ltx, Kenichi Handa, 2005/03/25
- Re: poor additions in quail/latin-ltx, Dave Love, 2005/03/25
- Re: poor additions in quail/latin-ltx, Kenichi Handa, 2005/03/26