[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: (format "Hello %1$S%2$s" 'world "!")
From: |
Noam Postavsky |
Subject: |
Re: (format "Hello %1$S%2$s" 'world "!") |
Date: |
Sun, 2 Jul 2017 11:03:22 -0400 |
On Sun, Jul 2, 2017 at 10:30 AM, Clément Pit-Claudel
<address@hidden> wrote:
> On 2017-07-02 10:02, Jean-Christophe Helary wrote:
>> (I am using the numbered fields that Philipp Stephani implemented in June.)
>
> Hm, this patch went through? I thought there were still disagreements about
> the syntax.
There were some tweaks following the initial patch, but I don't recall
any major disagreements about syntax. I posted some relevant links in
https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=12777#8
> Did we consider introducing a new formatting function (with a polyfill for
> older Emacsen), rather than this %n$ syntax?
I don't recall anyone suggesting that. Why would we need a new
function since %n$ would be an error for the old format anyway?
- Re: prin1 / princ vs message ?, (continued)
- Re: prin1 / princ vs message ?, Noam Postavsky, 2017/07/02
- Re: prin1 / princ vs message ?, Tino Calancha, 2017/07/02
- Re: prin1 / princ vs message ?, Jean-Christophe Helary, 2017/07/02
- Re: prin1 / princ vs message ?, Jean-Christophe Helary, 2017/07/02
- Re: prin1 / princ vs message ?, Tino Calancha, 2017/07/02
- Re: prin1 / princ vs message ?, Jean-Christophe Helary, 2017/07/02
- Re: prin1 / princ vs message ?, Philipp Stephani, 2017/07/02
- Re: prin1 / princ vs message ?, Jean-Christophe Helary, 2017/07/02
- (format "Hello %1$S%2$s" 'world "!"), Clément Pit-Claudel, 2017/07/02
- Re: (format "Hello %1$S%2$s" 'world "!"), Jean-Christophe Helary, 2017/07/02
- Re: (format "Hello %1$S%2$s" 'world "!"),
Noam Postavsky <=
- Re: (format "Hello %1$S%2$s" 'world "!"), Clément Pit-Claudel, 2017/07/02
- Re: (format "Hello %1$S%2$s" 'world "!"), Noam Postavsky, 2017/07/02
- Re: (format "Hello %1$S%2$s" 'world "!"), Clément Pit-Claudel, 2017/07/02
- Re: (format "Hello %1$S%2$s" 'world "!"), Vivek Dasmohapatra, 2017/07/02
Re: prin1 / princ vs message ?, Stefan Monnier, 2017/07/02