[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Continuous integration
From: |
Toon Claes |
Subject: |
Re: Continuous integration |
Date: |
Wed, 22 Mar 2017 16:59:55 +0100 (CET) |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.0.50 (darwin) |
Eli Zaretskii <address@hidden> writes:
>> From: Ted Zlatanov <address@hidden>
>> Date: Wed, 22 Mar 2017 09:14:58 -0400
>>
>> Absolutely. I think the benefits reach beyond that--especially if a pull
>> request workflow could be set up. Right now it's "push into branch; ask
>> for comments" which is delightfully retro.
>
> Actually, it's more like "obtain write access, then push your changes
> directly".
A platform like GitLab relies heavily on pushing code to feature
branches, and merge to master when someone approves. I know this is a
big change compared to the current workflow, that's why I am proposing
to start of by setting up CI (which will work with either workflow).
-- Toon
- Re: Continuous integration, (continued)
- Re: Continuous integration, Ted Zlatanov, 2017/03/22
- Re: Continuous integration, Toon Claes, 2017/03/22
- Re: Continuous integration, Phillip Lord, 2017/03/22
- Re: Continuous integration, Eli Zaretskii, 2017/03/22
- Re: Continuous integration,
Toon Claes <=
- Re: Continuous integration, Phillip Lord, 2017/03/22
- Re: Continuous integration, raman, 2017/03/22
- Re: Continuous integration, Phillip Lord, 2017/03/23
- Re: Continuous integration, T.V Raman, 2017/03/23
- Re: Continuous integration, Phillip Lord, 2017/03/23
- Re: Continuous integration, Toon Claes, 2017/03/23
- Re: Continuous integration, Chad Brown, 2017/03/23
- Re: Continuous integration, Yuri Khan, 2017/03/24
- Re: Continuous integration, Phillip Lord, 2017/03/24
- Re: Continuous integration, raman, 2017/03/24