[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: GUI vs TTY when saving & restoring framesets
From: |
Alan Mackenzie |
Subject: |
Re: GUI vs TTY when saving & restoring framesets |
Date: |
Sun, 22 Jan 2017 13:27:27 +0000 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.7.2 (2016-11-26) |
Hello, Juanma.
On Sun, Jan 22, 2017 at 05:21:44 +0100, Juanma Barranquero wrote:
> I've seen that there were several bugs related to framesets and ttys
> (I've located bug#17693 and bug#24298, but there were perhaps others).
> I don't understand yet the problems and the way they were fixed, but
> it has changed one previous feature.
To those bugs I would add:
#23630: Emacs 25.0.94.1: desktop-read loads buffers in the wrong order.
#19706: Emacs 25.0.50; (+ nil nil -1) in desktop-restore-frameset
They have relevance to tty vs. GUI, although they might not be
restricted to that difference.
--
Alan Mackenzie (Nuremberg, Germany).
- GUI vs TTY when saving & restoring framesets, Juanma Barranquero, 2017/01/21
- Re: GUI vs TTY when saving & restoring framesets, Juanma Barranquero, 2017/01/21
- Re: GUI vs TTY when saving & restoring framesets,
Alan Mackenzie <=
- Re: GUI vs TTY when saving & restoring framesets, Eli Zaretskii, 2017/01/22
- Re: GUI vs TTY when saving & restoring framesets, Alan Mackenzie, 2017/01/22
- Re: GUI vs TTY when saving & restoring framesets, Eli Zaretskii, 2017/01/22
- Re: GUI vs TTY when saving & restoring framesets, Alan Mackenzie, 2017/01/22
- Re: GUI vs TTY when saving & restoring framesets, Eli Zaretskii, 2017/01/22
- Re: GUI vs TTY when saving & restoring framesets, Alan Mackenzie, 2017/01/22
- Re: GUI vs TTY when saving & restoring framesets, Eli Zaretskii, 2017/01/22
- Re: GUI vs TTY when saving & restoring framesets, Alan Mackenzie, 2017/01/22
- Re: GUI vs TTY when saving & restoring framesets, Juanma Barranquero, 2017/01/22
- Re: GUI vs TTY when saving & restoring framesets, Andreas Schwab, 2017/01/23