[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: GUI vs TTY when saving & restoring framesets
From: |
Andreas Schwab |
Subject: |
Re: GUI vs TTY when saving & restoring framesets |
Date: |
Mon, 23 Jan 2017 18:39:14 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.1.91 (gnu/linux) |
On Jan 22 2017, Alan Mackenzie <address@hidden> wrote:
> I care a great deal about it. I have set up keys <f1> to <f11> in the
> global key map to mean "switch to frame Fn". Thus, rather than just
> being an arbitrary GUI window, each frame is associated with a particular
> function key. I even have "Fn" in the mode line to see which frame I'm
> in.
Have you considered giving the frames fixed names? Then you won't
depend on creation order.
Andreas.
--
Andreas Schwab, address@hidden
GPG Key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756 01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED5
"And now for something completely different."
- Re: GUI vs TTY when saving & restoring framesets, (continued)
- Re: GUI vs TTY when saving & restoring framesets, Alan Mackenzie, 2017/01/22
- Re: GUI vs TTY when saving & restoring framesets, Eli Zaretskii, 2017/01/22
- Re: GUI vs TTY when saving & restoring framesets, Alan Mackenzie, 2017/01/22
- Re: GUI vs TTY when saving & restoring framesets, Eli Zaretskii, 2017/01/22
- Re: GUI vs TTY when saving & restoring framesets, Alan Mackenzie, 2017/01/22
- Re: GUI vs TTY when saving & restoring framesets, Eli Zaretskii, 2017/01/22
- Re: GUI vs TTY when saving & restoring framesets, Alan Mackenzie, 2017/01/22
- Re: GUI vs TTY when saving & restoring framesets, Eli Zaretskii, 2017/01/22
- Re: GUI vs TTY when saving & restoring framesets, Alan Mackenzie, 2017/01/22
- Re: GUI vs TTY when saving & restoring framesets, Juanma Barranquero, 2017/01/22
- Re: GUI vs TTY when saving & restoring framesets,
Andreas Schwab <=
- Re: GUI vs TTY when saving & restoring framesets, martin rudalics, 2017/01/23
Re: GUI vs TTY when saving & restoring framesets, Eli Zaretskii, 2017/01/22