[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: mark expensive tests
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: mark expensive tests |
Date: |
Mon, 04 Jan 2016 19:23:19 +0200 |
> From: Michael Albinus <address@hidden>
> Cc: address@hidden, address@hidden
> Date: Mon, 04 Jan 2016 18:01:50 +0100
>
> Eli Zaretskii <address@hidden> writes:
>
> > My main point was that other than a couple of very specific tests, the
> > rest of the suite is quite fast, as test suites go.
>
> If we want to recommend to run the smoke tests at least before
> committing, then 2 minutes might be long enough to let people refuse
> that. That's why John has proposed a 30 seconds upper limit for the smoke
> tests.
I'm afraid that arbitrarily selecting 25% of the current test suite
will leave too of the functionality much untested. Emacs is a
hodge-podge of mostly unrelated functionalities, so I think it won't
be easy to come up with a meaningful sanity test.
But maybe I'm just missing something. Can you tell how will you
select the 30-sec worth of tests?
Thanks.
- Re: mark expensive tests, (continued)
- Re: mark expensive tests, John Wiegley, 2016/01/08
- Re: mark expensive tests, Eli Zaretskii, 2016/01/04
- Re: mark expensive tests, Eli Zaretskii, 2016/01/04
- Re: mark expensive tests, Paul Eggert, 2016/01/04
- Re: mark expensive tests, Eli Zaretskii, 2016/01/04
- Re: mark expensive tests, Paul Eggert, 2016/01/04
Re: mark expensive tests, Eli Zaretskii, 2016/01/04
Re: mark expensive tests, Michael Albinus, 2016/01/04