[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: char equivalence classes in search - why not symmetric?
|
From: |
Stefan Monnier |
|
Subject: |
Re: char equivalence classes in search - why not symmetric? |
|
Date: |
Tue, 01 Sep 2015 12:51:09 -0400 |
|
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
>> This feature, welcome as it is, seems only half-baked, so far.
>> How about equality for char-folding equivalence?
> These are code points, not oppressed minorities.
How 'bout we dedicate Sep 17 of every year all those Unicode characters
left in the dark?
Stefan
- Re: char equivalence classes in search - why not symmetric?, (continued)
- Re: char equivalence classes in search - why not symmetric?, Nix, 2015/09/07
- Re: char equivalence classes in search - why not symmetric?, Richard Stallman, 2015/09/07
- Re: char equivalence classes in search - why not symmetric?, Eli Zaretskii, 2015/09/03
- Re: char equivalence classes in search - why not symmetric?, Stefan Monnier, 2015/09/03
- RE: char equivalence classes in search - why not symmetric?, Drew Adams, 2015/09/03
- Re: char equivalence classes in search - why not symmetric?, Eli Zaretskii, 2015/09/03
- RE: char equivalence classes in search - why not symmetric?, Drew Adams, 2015/09/03
- Re: char equivalence classes in search - why not symmetric?, Artur Malabarba, 2015/09/02
- Re: char equivalence classes in search - why not symmetric?, Pip Cet, 2015/09/03
Re: char equivalence classes in search - why not symmetric?, Davis Herring, 2015/09/01
RE: char equivalence classes in search - why not symmetric?, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2015/09/01