emacs-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: char equivalence classes in search - why not symmetric?


From: Pip Cet
Subject: Re: char equivalence classes in search - why not symmetric?
Date: Thu, 3 Sep 2015 19:49:50 +0000

How about "C-q a"? C-q SPC already is special-cased to mean something different in isearch mode, so it wouldn't be a drastic change.

Of course that doesn't solve the problem for characters that are not represented on the user's keyboard; the quick fix that comes to mind is that quoted-insert with a negative prefix could read a character using the input method (not using read-quoted-char), then insert it as though C-q had been used with the corresponding positive prefix, so when using the TeX input method, "C-- C-q \ a l p h a" would be equivalent, during isearch, to "C-q α", to search for an alpha without an accent, breathing mark, or iota subscriptum. (The minus sign seems logical to me because we can think of C-q as a two-step command: switch to "literal mode", then read a character to insert. C-- C-q does the opposite: read a character, then go into "literal mode" to insert).

In essence, that would make C-q yet another modifier key...


On Wed, Sep 2, 2015 at 3:34 PM, Richard Stallman <address@hidden> wrote:
[[[ To any NSA and FBI agents reading my email: please consider    ]]]
[[[ whether defending the US Constitution against all enemies,     ]]]
[[[ foreign or domestic, requires you to follow Snowden's example. ]]]

Since it is possible to search for only 'á', it would be nice to have
some convenient way to search only for 'a' with no accents.

The only convenient interface I can think of is that you type, in a
postfix input method, a ' DEL.  Currently that is equivalent to typing
just  a.  But we could conceivably make it different.

Can someone think of some other interface for this?



--
Dr Richard Stallman
President, Free Software Foundation (gnu.org, fsf.org)
Internet Hall-of-Famer (internethalloffame.org)
Skype: No way! See stallman.org/skype.html.




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]