[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Dynamic loading progress
From: |
Aurélien Aptel |
Subject: |
Re: Dynamic loading progress |
Date: |
Wed, 4 Feb 2015 22:58:08 +0100 |
On Sat, Jan 31, 2015 at 8:30 PM, Eli Zaretskii <address@hidden> wrote:
> Most probably, that's not the right solution. You should instead
> refrain from declaring Qc, since make-doc and globals.h now take care
> of that. See how other Q* symbols are defined and declared.
You can't expect modules to keep up with core global variables. At
least not for such generic, short variables which shouldn't be global
in the first place. What do you think?
- Re: Dynamic loading progress, Ted Zlatanov, 2015/02/04
- Re: Dynamic loading progress,
Aurélien Aptel <=
- Re: Dynamic loading progress, Aurélien Aptel, 2015/02/04
- Re: Dynamic loading progress, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2015/02/04
- Re: Dynamic loading progress, Eli Zaretskii, 2015/02/04
- Re: Dynamic loading progress, Aurélien Aptel, 2015/02/08
- Re: Dynamic loading progress, Paul Eggert, 2015/02/08
- Re: Dynamic loading progress, Stefan Monnier, 2015/02/08
- Re: Dynamic loading progress, Paul Eggert, 2015/02/09
- Re: Dynamic loading progress, Aurélien Aptel, 2015/02/09
- Re: Dynamic loading progress, Eli Zaretskii, 2015/02/09
- Re: Dynamic loading progress, Aurélien Aptel, 2015/02/09