Re: Can anyone correct the Bazaar reference "revno:111954.1.97"?

[Joshua Judson Rosen]

Eli Zaretskii <address@hidden> writes:
>
> > > > > I think the correct reference is 111964.1.6.  It was merged in
> > > > > r112051.
> > > > 
> > > > ... and the "revno:111954.1.97" was a reference to trunk revno:112051.
> > >
> > > No, it isn't, IMO: they have different parents.
> > 
> > They actually don't have different parents--they have the same revid,
> > and really _are_ the same revision-object.
>
> No, they haven't, and no, they aren't:
[...]
> > Same node in the DAG, addressed differently by observers sitting at
> > different points in the DAG.
>
> As I show above, they aren't the same nodes in the DAG.

I'm afraid there's a misunderstanding here about which "they" we're
talking about....

I didn't say that "trunk 111964.1.6" was the same node as "trunk 112051";
it's self-evident that "trunk 11964.1.6" was merged by "trunk 112051",
and that the two are therefor necessarily different nodes in the DAG.
I'm in `violent *agreement*' with you about that :)

The question that Eric asked, and that I was answering, was what
Handa's "*work* 111954.1.97" was, and the answer is:

    "*work* 111954.1.97" is the same as "*trunk* 112051"

I'm not sure what I'm being unclear about. Have you tried
running through the procudure that I laid out (starting at
"bzr branch trunk -r 111954.1.4 handa-work")? If you just do this:

    bzr branch trunk -r 111954.1.4 handa-work
    bzr log handa-work -r 111958 # notice Handa's comment about "111954.1.97"
    bzr log trunk -r 111954.1.97:handa-work

Is there actually something in there that you disagree with?

What procedure led you to the conclusion that Handa's "work 111954.1.97"
was the same node as "trunk 111964.1.6"?

-- 
"'tis an ill wind that blows no minds."