emacs-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Can anyone correct the Bazaar reference "revno:111954.1.97"?


From: Eli Zaretskii
Subject: Re: Can anyone correct the Bazaar reference "revno:111954.1.97"?
Date: Sun, 02 Mar 2014 23:27:36 +0200

> From: Andreas Schwab <address@hidden>
> Cc: address@hidden,  address@hidden,  address@hidden,  address@hidden
> Date: Sun, 02 Mar 2014 22:10:49 +0100
> 
> Eli Zaretskii <address@hidden> writes:
> 
> >> From: Andreas Schwab <address@hidden>
> >> Cc: Joshua Judson Rosen <address@hidden>,  address@hidden,  
> >> address@hidden,  address@hidden
> >> Date: Sun, 02 Mar 2014 19:25:48 +0100
> >> 
> >> revno:111954.1.97 refers to revno:112051, not revno:111964.1.6.
> >
> > Maybe so, but how did you determine that?
> 
> The fixup comes immediately after it.

Not sure I'm following you.  What fixup are you referring to?  If you
mean the fixup in 111954.1.4, then this is what I see:

  112229: K. Handa 2013-04-05 [merge] Optimize the code for reading UTF-8 files.
    111954.1.7: K. Handa 2013-04-05 [merge] merge trunk
    111954.1.6: K. Handa 2013-04-05 Optimize the code for reading UTF-8 files.
    111954.1.5: K. Handa 2013-03-21 [merge] merge trunk
    111954.1.4: K. Handa 2013-03-21 Fix a bug introduced by revno:111954.1.97
  ...
  112098: K. Handa 2013-03-20 [merge] coding.c (syms_of_coding): Initialize 
disable_ascii_optimization 1.
    111954.1.3: K. Handa 2013-03-20 [merge] merge trunk
    111954.1.2: K. Handa 2013-03-20 coding.c (syms_of_coding): Initialize 
disable_ascii_optimization 1.
    111954.1.1: K. Handa 2013-03-19 [merge] merge trunk
  ...
  112051: K. Handa 2013-03-15 [merge] Optimize ASCII file reading with EOL 
formatdetection and decoding.
    111964.1.7: K. Handa 2013-03-15 [merge] merge trunk
    111964.1.6: K. Handa 2013-03-15 Optimize ASCII file reading with EOL format 
detection and decoding.
    111964.1.5: K. Handa 2013-03-11 [merge] merge trunk

My reading of this is that what was fixed in 111954.1.4 was introduced
in 111964.1.6 (I saw that by looking at the diffs of these commits),
and there are 6 days and many commits between those two.  On the
trunk, the code appeared in r112051 and was fixed in r112229.

Am I missing something?



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]