Re: Can anyone correct the Bazaar reference "revno:111954.1.97"?

[Eli Zaretskii]

> Date: Sat, 1 Mar 2014 17:02:07 -0500
> From: "Eric S. Raymond" <address@hidden>
> Cc: Eli Zaretskii <address@hidden>, address@hidden, address@hidden
> 
> Oh, crap.  Now I'm confused about what to replace that revno with.  The
> alternatives are:
> 
> 111964.1.6    2013-03-15T16:03:address@hidden
> 112051        2013-03-15T16:06:address@hidden
> 
> It's only a difference in timestamp.  Do they have the same content?
> If not, serious can of worms.  If so, the qustion of which timestamp
> to consider authoritative becomes more philosophical.

Between 111964.1.6 and 112051 there was 111964.1.7, so the two commits
you mention cannot have the same content.  And even if there were not
111964.1.7, from bzr POV those two commits are different (they have
different parents).