[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: Rectangular regions
From: |
Stephen J. Turnbull |
Subject: |
RE: Rectangular regions |
Date: |
Sat, 02 Nov 2013 15:31:42 +0900 |
Drew Adams writes:
> All the more reason to move it to the rectangle-command prefix,
> `C-x r', where additional interesting things that are related
> can also be placed.
+1
Discoverability of the default bindings is very important. If it's on
C-x r, C-x r C-h will list it for you.
Users who use the function frequently can put it on an more accessible
sequence.
- Re: Rectangular regions, Leo Liu, 2013/11/01
- Re: Rectangular regions, Josh, 2013/11/01
- RE: Rectangular regions, Drew Adams, 2013/11/01
- RE: Rectangular regions,
Stephen J. Turnbull <=
- Re: Rectangular regions, Jambunathan K, 2013/11/02
- Re: Rectangular regions, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2013/11/02
- Re: [SPAM] Re: Rectangular regions, Jarek Czekalski, 2013/11/02
- Re: [SPAM] Re: Rectangular regions, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2013/11/02
- Re: [SPAM] Re: Rectangular regions, Jambunathan K, 2013/11/02
- Re: [SPAM] Re: Rectangular regions, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2013/11/02
- Re: [SPAM] Re: Rectangular regions, Jambunathan K, 2013/11/02
- Re: [SPAM] Re: Rectangular regions, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2013/11/03
- RE: Rectangular regions, Drew Adams, 2013/11/02
- Re: Rectangular regions, Jambunathan K, 2013/11/02