[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Emacs Windows barebin distribution
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: Emacs Windows barebin distribution |
Date: |
Sun, 18 Nov 2012 23:14:52 +0200 |
> From: Mathias Dahl <address@hidden>
> Date: Sun, 18 Nov 2012 20:56:54 +0100
> Cc: Christoph Scholtes <address@hidden>, address@hidden
>
> However, if the concept of the barebins were broken in some sense
> (that's how I interpret your and others' replies here), it's not
> anything worth arguing over.
It was broken in the sense that they couldn't be used for the purpose
for which they were invented, namely, to allow users re-dump Emacs
after loading some non-standard combination of Lisp packages.
The decision to drop the barebin distribution was made back in April,
we just wanted to wait for some time to see if someone will miss them,
after they were removed. No one did.
- Re: Emacs Windows barebin distribution, (continued)
- Re: Emacs Windows barebin distribution, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2012/11/18
- Re: Emacs Windows barebin distribution, Eli Zaretskii, 2012/11/18
- Re: Emacs Windows barebin distribution, Jason Rumney, 2012/11/20
- Re: Emacs Windows barebin distribution, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2012/11/20
- Re: Emacs Windows barebin distribution, Mathias Dahl, 2012/11/18
- Re: Emacs Windows barebin distribution, Dani Moncayo, 2012/11/18
- Re: Emacs Windows barebin distribution, Dani Moncayo, 2012/11/18
- Re: Emacs Windows barebin distribution, Eli Zaretskii, 2012/11/18
- Re: Emacs Windows barebin distribution,
Eli Zaretskii <=