[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Tabs are ready?
From: |
Alin Soare |
Subject: |
Re: Tabs are ready? |
Date: |
Thu, 2 Feb 2012 13:54:13 +0200 |
When I wrote them, I tried a few possibilities, but I remember I inserted them in the struct of a frame.
In any case, a tab shoud be able to respond to events, and each event must be defined by a lisp function.
This is the point where I stopped.
I finished only the creation/deletion/ basic functions for tabs, and I inserted some simple events, like hide tab, or show tab, and did not continue any more.
Whatever implementation will be , it must define the events as elisp functions ; even after the creation of a tab, there must be an event that calls a lisp function.
In this manner, we will be able to have a lots of functionalities implemented as tabs. There can be defined lots of patterns for tabs.
2012/2/2 martin rudalics
<address@hidden>
> Wouldn't it be easier to implement tabs now with the help of Martin's side windows?
It depends on what "tabs" stands for and how many "tabs" we want to show
on any frame: If we want per-window tabs, atomic windows should be used.
If we want per-frame tabs, side windows could be used.
martin
- Tabs are ready?, Alin Soare, 2012/02/01
- Re: Tabs are ready?, Juri Linkov, 2012/02/02
- Re: Tabs are ready?, martin rudalics, 2012/02/03
- Re: Tabs are ready?, Juanma Barranquero, 2012/02/03
- Re: Tabs are ready?, martin rudalics, 2012/02/04
Re: Tabs are ready?, Alin Soare, 2012/02/02