[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Unwarranted invocation of starttls
From: |
Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen |
Subject: |
Re: Unwarranted invocation of starttls |
Date: |
Wed, 04 Jan 2012 20:39:27 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.110018 (No Gnus v0.18) Emacs/24.0.92 (gnu/linux) |
Ted Zlatanov <address@hidden> writes:
> It can work, with a lot of fiddling, but is unreliable and causes many
> issues that are hard to replicate, timeouts especially. I don't know of
> anyone happily using it on W32 and think disabling it on W32 is a good
> choice.
If it can work, isn't there a way to make it work reliably? Where does
it fail, usually?
But if this is the case, I can add a test like
(memq system-type '(windows-nt ms-dos))
to `starttls-available-p'... Opinions?
--
(domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.)
bloggy blog http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no/
- Unwarranted invocation of starttls, Eli Zaretskii, 2012/01/01
- Re: Unwarranted invocation of starttls, Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen, 2012/01/01
- Re: Unwarranted invocation of starttls, Eli Zaretskii, 2012/01/01
- Re: Unwarranted invocation of starttls, Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen, 2012/01/03
- Re: Unwarranted invocation of starttls, Eli Zaretskii, 2012/01/03
- Re: Unwarranted invocation of starttls, Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen, 2012/01/03
- Re: Unwarranted invocation of starttls, Ted Zlatanov, 2012/01/04
- Re: Unwarranted invocation of starttls,
Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen <=
- Re: Unwarranted invocation of starttls, Ted Zlatanov, 2012/01/04
- Re: Unwarranted invocation of starttls, Eli Zaretskii, 2012/01/04
- Re: Unwarranted invocation of starttls, Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen, 2012/01/05